tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9016693.post7832040584940108990..comments2023-11-03T03:24:32.662-05:00Comments on typings of AndR, k.s.c.: 2 Brünish somethingsAndrew Aaron Heathwaitehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13957741864754144273noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9016693.post-85346428600180953382010-04-26T10:31:37.217-05:002010-04-26T10:31:37.217-05:00Novelty disappears with the familiarity occasioned...Novelty disappears with the familiarity occasioned by passing time. The conundrum Brün leaves us in is this: How can we make something ever-new?<br /><br />Perhaps we can merely set performance possibilities, à la Cage, to be selected "aleatorically" i.e. by a chance or random process. Still, this won't suffice to create ever-new realisations of the underlying possibilities; in some sense, all such realisations are "the same".<br /><br />The only way to ensure "constant novelty" (!) is to allow NO boundaries on the possibilties that may be realised, neither of form, of content, or even of aesthetic or ethical implication.<br /><br />Such a constantly new piece of art is truly unique, and is likely to use means or create outcomes we feel to be inapt, ugly, wrong or even evil as they are to be right, apt, beautiful or good.<br /><br />Such a unique work transcends the usual categories, and leaves criticism nothing constructive to say.Yahyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00067784373812199349noreply@blogger.com